"ten" is squeezing the earth

can an artwork and its site be criticized separately in terms of form and/or meaning? if an artwork moves to a new site, should it be readjusted in accordance to this new location?

in mehmet ali uysal’s installation "ten", public space is a part of the work instead of existing merely as a site. although it might seem as a series since there are applications in belgium, france, switzerland, turkey and the united states, it should be considered as one single artwork which is "squeezing" the earth from 5 separate locations.